Radeon RX Vega M GH vs GeForce RTX 4060
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 198.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GH.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-198.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+198.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GH and GeForce RTX 4060
Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 6,548 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 198.5%. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 2460 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,548 | 19,548+199% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 3072+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.656 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+313% |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | 2460 MHz+107% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 96 | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 0.38 MB | 3 MB+689% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 24 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX Vega M GH lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega M GH comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 32.8% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 272 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 1024-bit+700% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 24 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC 5th gen.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega M GH draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 14% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-13% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 73°C |
| Perf/Watt | 65.5 | 170.0+160% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($299 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GH | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 65.4 |
| Codename | Polaris 22 | AD107 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #373 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX Vega M GH and GeForce RTX 4060
