Radeon 760M vs Radeon TM

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon TM

2024

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon 760M

2024

Radeon TM

2024

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon TM better than Radeon 760M?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,449 vs 5,564 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon TM is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 760M is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon TM can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Radeon TM is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon TM is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.1% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 760M is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 760M make more sense than Radeon TM?

Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon TM. The trade-off is that Radeon TM currently gives you 2.1% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 760M Benchmark Check

Radeon TM Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon 760M	Radeon TM
1080p
low	46 FPS	93 FPS
medium	29 FPS	78 FPS
high	21 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	32 FPS	80 FPS
medium	19 FPS	68 FPS
high	11 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	12 FPS	30 FPS
medium	8 FPS	28 FPS
high	5 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	3 FPS	17 FPS

Open Radeon 760M Open Radeon TM

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon 760M	Radeon TM
1080p
low	91 FPS	126 FPS
medium	64 FPS	88 FPS
high	44 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	58 FPS	90 FPS
medium	38 FPS	60 FPS
high	29 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	30 FPS	38 FPS
medium	21 FPS	28 FPS
high	17 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	15 FPS

Open Radeon 760M Open Radeon TM

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon 760M	Radeon TM
1080p
low	245 FPS	250 FPS
medium	196 FPS	200 FPS
high	163 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	125 FPS
1440p
low	184 FPS	188 FPS
medium	147 FPS	150 FPS
high	123 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	125 FPS
medium	98 FPS	100 FPS
high	77 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	60 FPS

Open Radeon 760M Open Radeon TM

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon 760M	Radeon TM
1080p
low	154 FPS	172 FPS
medium	120 FPS	135 FPS
high	103 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	89 FPS
1440p
low	109 FPS	118 FPS
medium	87 FPS	96 FPS
high	74 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	64 FPS
4K
low	65 FPS	71 FPS
medium	52 FPS	56 FPS
high	42 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	33 FPS

Open Radeon 760M Open Radeon TM

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 760M and Radeon TM

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Radeon TM

The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 760M scores 5,449 and the Radeon TM reaches 5,564 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on a 4 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Raw compute: 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM). Boost clocks: 2599 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Radeon 760M) vs 16 (Radeon TM).

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon TM
G3D Mark Score	5,449	5,564+2%
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	4 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	512	1024+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.323 TFLOPS	5.939 TFLOPS+12%
Boost Clock	2599 MHz	2900 MHz+12%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	64+100%
L1 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR upscaling + RSR
Ray Tracing Cores	8	16+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon TM
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon TM
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.