
Radeon 760M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 760M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,449 vs 5,954).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅+9.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 760M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.
Radeon 760M
2024Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅+9.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,449 vs 5,954).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 760M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5500M better than Radeon 760M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 760M make more sense than Radeon RX 5500M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 760M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 760M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 760M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 64 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 760M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 53 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 760M and Radeon RX 5500M

Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon 760M scores 5,449 versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 5,954 — the Radeon RX 5500M leads by 9.3%. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M). Boost clocks: 2599 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,449 | 5,954+9% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1408+175% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.323 TFLOPS+15% | 4.632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2599 MHz+58% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 88+175% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 760M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500M).
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W — a 140% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-82% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 363.3+419% | 70.0 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













