RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 5060
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 5060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation.
| Insight | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $299 versus $1,450 for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, it costs 79% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 388.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+388.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,450) | ✅More affordable ($299) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 5060
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
GeForce RTX 5060
The GeForce RTX 5060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2497 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 145W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,836 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation scores 20,669 and the GeForce RTX 5060 reaches 20,836 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 5060 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 3,840 (GeForce RTX 5060). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 19.18 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2497 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 5060) with 192 Tensor cores vs 120.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,669 | 20,836 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+60% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS | 19.18 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2497 MHz+60% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+60% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+58% | 3.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+50% | 32 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+60% | 30 |
| Tensor Cores | 192+60% | 120 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 5060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce RTX 5060 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 5060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060) — a 60% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060. Bus width: 160-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 280 GB/s | 448 GB/s+60% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit+25% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+50% | 32 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs NVENC 9th gen (GeForce RTX 5060). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 6th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5060).
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 9th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 6th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 5060's 145W — a 69.8% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 5060). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-52% | 145W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 450W-40% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 295.3+105% | 143.7 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $1450, while the GeForce RTX 5060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The GeForce RTX 5060 costs 79.4% less ($1151 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 69.7 (GeForce RTX 5060) — the GeForce RTX 5060 offers 387.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 5060 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $299-85% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1450 | $299-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3 | 69.7+387% |
| Codename | AD104 | GB206 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | May 19 2025 |
| Ranking | #71 | #69 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 5060
