RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Popular choices:
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.2% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation.
| Insight | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,167 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation scores 20,669 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 22,167 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile leads by 7.2%. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 7,424 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 24.72 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 58 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 192 Tensor cores vs 232.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,669 | 22,167+7% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 7424+21% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS | 24.72 TFLOPS+29% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1665 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 192 | 232+21% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 7.3 MB+22% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 58+21% |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 232+21% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has 12 GB. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 54.3% advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile. Bus width: 160-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 12 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 280 GB/s | 432 GB/s+54% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 192-bit+20% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation draws 70W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 110W — a 44.4% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-36% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 150W-80% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 295.3+47% | 201.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
