RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $423 versus $1,450 for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, it costs 71% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 233.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+233.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,450) | ✅More affordable ($423) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,096 points. Launch price was $334.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation scores 20,669 and the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB reaches 20,096 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2581 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) with 192 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,669+3% | 20,096 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+140% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS+45% | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2581 MHz+65% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+20% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1500% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+20% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses DLSS 3 (AI-based) which is hardware-accelerated on Tensor Cores, often providing superior image quality. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB utilizes FSR 3 & AFMF, which is more open but driver-based. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles.The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) — a 37.1% advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB. Bus width: 160-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 12 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 280 GB/s | 384 GB/s+37% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 192-bit+20% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1500% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB).
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 600W (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-72% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 600W-20% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 295.3+267% | 80.4 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $1450, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB launched at $289 and now averages $423. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB costs 70.8% less ($1027 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 47.5 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) — the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers 232.2% better value.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $289-86% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1450 | $423-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3 | 47.5+232% |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 22 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #71 | #75 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
