RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6750 XT
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6750 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation.
| Insight | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6750 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $320 versus $1,450 for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, it costs 78% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 353.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+353.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,450) | ✅More affordable ($320) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and Radeon RX 6750 XT
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
Radeon RX 6750 XT
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2150 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,686 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation scores 20,669 and the Radeon RX 6750 XT reaches 20,686 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6750 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 13.31 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) with 192 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,669 | 20,686 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+140% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS+44% | 13.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2600 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+20% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1500% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+20% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses DLSS 3 (AI-based) which is hardware-accelerated on Tensor Cores, often providing superior image quality. The Radeon RX 6750 XT utilizes FSR 3 & AFMF, which is more open but driver-based. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles.The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6750 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6750 XT has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 6750 XT offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 XT) — a 54.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 XT. Bus width: 160-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 XT) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 12 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 280 GB/s | 432 GB/s+54% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 192-bit+20% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1500% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 (Radeon RX 6750 XT).
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 6750 XT's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-72% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 295.3+257% | 82.7 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $1450, while the Radeon RX 6750 XT launched at $549 and now averages $320. The Radeon RX 6750 XT costs 77.9% less ($1130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 64.6 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) — the Radeon RX 6750 XT offers 351.7% better value. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $549-73% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1450 | $320-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3 | 64.6+352% |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 22 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | March 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #71 | #70 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and Radeon RX 6750 XT
