RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 52.8% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation.
| Insight | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-52.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+52.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $590 versus $1,450 for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, it costs 59% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 275.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+275.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,450) | ✅More affordable ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation scores 20,669 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 52.8%. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 192 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,669 | 31,578+53% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 7680+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+109% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2610 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 192 | 240+25% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 7.5 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 60+25% |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 240+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 80% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 160-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 12 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 280 GB/s | 504 GB/s+80% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 192-bit+20% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 121.1% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-75% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 700W-7% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 295.3+167% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $1450, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 59.3% less ($860 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 274.1% better value.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $799-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1450 | $590-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3 | 53.5+274% |
| Codename | AD104 | AD104 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #71 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
