RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon PRO W6800
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W6800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W6800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,450 versus $2,249 for the Radeon PRO W6800, it costs 36% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 58.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+58.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($1,450) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,249) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and Radeon PRO W6800
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation scores 20,669 and the Radeon PRO W6800 reaches 20,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2320 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 60 (Radeon PRO W6800) with 192 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,669+2% | 20,270 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+60% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS+8% | 17.82 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2320 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 192 | 240+25% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+700% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 60+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W6800 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) — a 105.7% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6800. Bus width: 160-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 32 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 280 GB/s | 576 GB/s+106% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 256-bit+60% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800).
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation draws 70W versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W6800). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-72% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 295.3+264% | 81.1 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $1450, while the Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249 and now averages $2249. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation costs 35.5% less ($799 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation offers 58.9% better value. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999-11% | $2249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1450-36% | $2249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3+59% | 9.0 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #71 | #74 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and Radeon PRO W6800
