RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

140%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

139%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

136%

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

131%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

128%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

124%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

122%

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

120%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

120%

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

116%

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

114%

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

105%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

100%

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

87%

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

84%

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

73%

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

69%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

68%

#77

Radeon Pro VII

MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400

68%

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

65%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

65%

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

62%

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

61%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

60%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 162.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1650 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+162.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-162.7%)
Longevity	🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (2 GB)	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $1,450 for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, it costs 95% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 636% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+636%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,450)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and GeForce GTX 1650

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation scores 20,669 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation leads by 162.7%. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	20,669+163%	7,869
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Turing
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	6144+586%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	19.17 TFLOPS+542%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1560 MHz	1665 MHz+7%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	192+243%	56
L1 Cache	6 MB+582%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+4700%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1650 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.0 (Native)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 118.8% advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. Bus width: 160-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6 ECC	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	280 GB/s+119%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	160-bit+25%	128-bit
L2 Cache	48 MB+4700%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12.2+2%	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation draws 70W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 6.9% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

Feature	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	70W-7%	75W
Recommended PSU	750W	300W-60%
Power Connector	1x 8-pin	None
Length	267mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	295.3+182%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $1450, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 94.8% less ($1375 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 633.6% better value. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).