
Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:

RTX A2000 12GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A2000 12GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A2000 12GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌78% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌192.9% higher power demand at 205W vs 70W.
RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 69.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.6 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 205W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 69.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.6 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 205W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A2000 12GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A2000 12GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌78% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌192.9% higher power demand at 205W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A2000 12GB better than Radeon Pro W5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 431 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 232 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700 and RTX A2000 12GB

Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX A2000 12GB
RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the RTX A2000 12GB reaches 13,721 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX A2000 12GB uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,380+5% | 13,721 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3328+44% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.893 TFLOPS+11% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1930 MHz+61% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+38% | 104 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A2000 12GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 70W — a 98.2% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 500W (RTX A2000 12GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W | 70W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.1 | 196.0+180% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799 MSRP, while the RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449. The RTX A2000 12GB costs 43.8% less ($350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 30.6 (RTX A2000 12GB) — the RTX A2000 12GB offers 70% better value. The RTX A2000 12GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $449-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0 | 30.6+70% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GA106 |
| Release | November 19 2019 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #163 | #177 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













