Ryzen 3 210
VS
Core 3 100U

Ryzen 3 210 vs Core 3 100U

AMD

Ryzen 3 210

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Core 3 100U

6 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 210

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
107%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
100%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
90%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 3 100U

#107
Core Ultra 5 228V
MSRP: $295|Avg: $295
108%
#111
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180
107%
#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
102%
#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
100%
#121
Core 3 100U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
99%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Core 3 100U shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightRyzen 3 210Core 3 100U
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 3 210Core 3 100U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 210 and Core 3 100U

AMD

Ryzen 3 210

The Ryzen 3 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,209 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core 3 100U

The Core 3 100U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 13,312 points. Launch price was $426.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 210 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core 3 100U offers 6 cores / 8 threads — the Core 3 100U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 210 versus 4.7 GHz on the Core 3 100U — identical boost frequencies (base: 3 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 210 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core 3 100U uses Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 210 scores 13,209 against the Core 3 100U's 13,312 — a 0.8% lead for the Core 3 100U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 210 vs 10 MB (total) on the Core 3 100U.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Core 3 100U
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 8+50%
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+150%
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
Process
4 nm-60%
10 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024)
PassMark
13,209
13,312
Cinebench R23 Multi
515
Geekbench 6 Single
2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 210 uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core 3 100U uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Core 3 100U
Socket
FP7
FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
14
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 210) / not specified (Core 3 100U). The Ryzen 3 210 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Core 3 100U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 210 targets Laptop.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Core 3 100U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 740M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Laptop