Ryzen 3 210
VS
Core i7-1265U

Ryzen 3 210 vs Core i7-1265U

AMD

Ryzen 3 210

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Core i7-1265U

10 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 210

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
107%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
100%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
90%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-1265U

#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
126%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
123%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
114%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
114%
#198
Core i7-1265U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-1265U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen 3 210 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightRyzen 3 210Core i7-1265U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-U (2022) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 3 210Core i7-1265U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 210 and Core i7-1265U

AMD

Ryzen 3 210

The Ryzen 3 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,209 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-1265U

The Core i7-1265U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,282 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 210 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-1265U offers 10 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-1265U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 210 versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-1265U — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-1265U (base: 3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 3 210 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core i7-1265U uses Alder Lake-U (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 210 scores 13,209 against the Core i7-1265U's 13,282 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-1265U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 210 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1265U.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Core i7-1265U
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
10 / 12+150%
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz
4.8 GHz+2%
Base Clock
3 GHz+67%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
Process
4 nm-43%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Alder Lake-U (2022)
PassMark
13,209
13,282
Cinebench R23 Multi
515
Geekbench 6 Single
2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 210 uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-1265U uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Core i7-1265U
Socket
FP7
FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
14
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 210) / not specified (Core i7-1265U). The Ryzen 3 210 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Core i7-1265U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 210 targets Laptop.

FeatureRyzen 3 210Core i7-1265U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 740M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Laptop