Tesla K80
VS
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Tesla K80 vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

NVIDIA

Tesla K80

2014Core: 562 MHzBoost: 824 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022Core: 1515 MHzBoost: 1755 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla K80 is positioned at rank #343 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla K80

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
98%
#328
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
13807%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
100%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
99%
#346
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
97%
#347
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
96%
#348
Quadro FX 3800
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
96%
#350
GRID K520
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50
92%
#351
GRID P40-12Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
91%
#352
FirePro 2270
MSRP: $149|Avg: $30
89%
#353
FirePro 2460
MSRP: $180|Avg: $10
88%
#355
FirePro 3D V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
85%
#356
Quadro FX 580
MSRP: $199|Avg: $500
85%
#358
GRID M60-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
106%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
102%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
101%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
101%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
101%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
100%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
99%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
98%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
97%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
97%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
96%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
96%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
94%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
94%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
94%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
93%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
92%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
91%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
91%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
90%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla K80 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 121.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K80.

InsightTesla K80GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-121.7%)
Leading raw performance (+121.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015))
🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Tesla K80 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $150 for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, it costs 67% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 35.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightTesla K80GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+35.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K80 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

NVIDIA

Tesla K80

The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Tesla K80 scores 5,363 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 121.7%. The Tesla K80 is built on Kepler 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,496 (Tesla K80) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 824 MHz vs 1755 MHz.

FeatureTesla K80GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
G3D Mark Score
5,363
11,892+122%
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2496 ×2
2560+3%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.113 TFLOPS ×2
8.986 TFLOPS+118%
Boost Clock
824 MHz
1755 MHz+113%
ROPs
48 ×2+50%
32
TMUs
208 ×2+160%
80
L1 Cache
0.2 MB
2.5 MB+1150%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureTesla K80GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tesla K80 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureTesla K80GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla K80 draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K80) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.

FeatureTesla K80GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
TDP
300W
130W-57%
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
235mm
Height
124mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
17.9
91.5+411%
💰

Value Analysis

The Tesla K80 launched at $5000 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The Tesla K80 costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 107.3 (Tesla K80) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the Tesla K80 offers 35.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).

FeatureTesla K80GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP
$5000
$249-95%
Avg Price (30d)
$50-67%
$150
Performance per Dollar
107.3+35%
79.3
Codename
GK210
GA106
Release
November 17 2014
January 4 2022
Ranking
#419
#224