CPU
GPU
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank #150 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2.
| Insight | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $50 for the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, it costs 40% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 63.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+63.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,390 and the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 reaches 3,331 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,390+2% | 3,331 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 96 | 192+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2's 106W — a 111.8% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 210mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 68°C.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-72% | 106W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 210mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 68°C-20% |
| Perf/Watt | 113.0+260% | 31.4 |
Value Analysis
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 launched at $129 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 111.0 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) — the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers 63.7% better value. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-22% | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $30-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.8 | 111.0+64% |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GF116 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | March 15 2011 |
| Ranking | #508 | #739 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
