Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

CPU

GPU

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

2013Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

3,390

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

Radeon RX 6600 XT

GeForce RTX 5060

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

134

3,415

+0.7%

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

GeForce RTX 5060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank #150 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

#42

Radeon RX 6600S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

96%

#140

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

320%

#142

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

290%

#143

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

290%

#147

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

263%

#148

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

262%

#150

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#157

GeForce 830M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#158

GeForce GT 750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

98%

#159

GeForce GT 425M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

Insight	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $50 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 0.7% better value per dollar than the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

Insight	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+0.7%)
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,390 and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST reaches 3,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST uses Kepler, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST).

Feature	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
G3D Mark Score	3,390	3,415
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake	Kepler
Process Node	10 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	96	768+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
DirectX	12.1	12 (FL 11_0)
Vulkan	1.2+9%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST).

Feature	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Encoder	QuickSync	NVENC 1st gen
Decoder	QuickSync	PureVideo VP5
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST's 134W — a 126.8% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 97°C.

Feature	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
TDP	30W-78%	134W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	241mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85-12%	97°C
Perf/Watt	113.0+343%	25.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST launched at $169 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 68.3 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers 0.7% better value. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).