Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro W5500M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank 150 and the Radeon Pro W5500M is on rank 3, so the Radeon Pro W5500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

#42

Radeon RX 6600S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

96%

#140

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

320%

#142

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

290%

#143

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

290%

#147

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

263%

#148

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

262%

#150

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#157

GeForce 830M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#158

GeForce GT 750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

98%

#159

GeForce GT 425M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5500M

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

128%

#3

Radeon Pro W5500M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro W5500M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

Insight	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7	Radeon Pro W5500M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro W5500M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro W5500M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon Pro W5500M

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

Radeon Pro W5500M

The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,390 and the Radeon Pro W5500M reaches 3,470 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Radeon Pro W5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 10 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M).

Feature	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7	Radeon Pro W5500M
G3D Mark Score	3,390	3,470+2%
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	10 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	96	1408+1367%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7	Radeon Pro W5500M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7	Radeon Pro W5500M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7	Radeon Pro W5500M
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Decoder: QuickSync vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500M).

Feature	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7	Radeon Pro W5500M
Encoder	QuickSync	VCN 2.0
Decoder	QuickSync	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2	HEVC,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the Radeon Pro W5500M's 85W — a 95.7% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.