Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 1650

CPUCPUGPUGPU

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
30
3,390
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R7 450
brand logoRadeon HD 6970M
brand logoRadeon HD 8770
brand logoRadeon HD 6990
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoRadeon RX 6600 XT
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060
GeForce GTX 1650
75
7,869
+132.1%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank #150 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
96%
#140
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
320%
#142
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
290%
#143
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
290%
#147
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
263%
#148
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
262%
#150
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#157
GeForce 830M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#158
GeForce GT 750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
98%
#159
GeForce GT 425M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 132.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

InsightTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTX 1650
Performance
❌Lower raw frame rates (-132.1%)
✅Leading raw performance (+132.1%)
Longevity
Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
—
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 54.7% better value per dollar than the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

InsightTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
❌Lower cost efficiency
✅Better overall value (+54.7%)
Upfront Cost
✅More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low153 FPS
medium122 FPS
high102 FPS
ultra76 FPS
1440p
low96 FPS
medium65 FPS
high53 FPS
ultra37 FPS
4K
low30 FPS
medium23 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low109 FPS
medium95 FPS
high74 FPS
ultra62 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS
medium72 FPS
high59 FPS
ultra51 FPS
4K
low35 FPS
medium32 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low146 FPS
medium99 FPS
high61 FPS
ultra33 FPS
1440p
low62 FPS
medium48 FPS
high26 FPS
ultra17 FPS
4K
low23 FPS
medium17 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra7 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low141 FPS
medium102 FPS
high81 FPS
ultra66 FPS
1440p
low75 FPS
medium58 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra31 FPS
4K
low30 FPS
medium22 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra13 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low153 FPS
medium122 FPS
high102 FPS
ultra76 FPS
1440p
low114 FPS
medium92 FPS
high76 FPS
ultra57 FPS
4K
low76 FPS
medium61 FPS
high51 FPS
ultra38 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low307 FPS
medium283 FPS
high236 FPS
ultra177 FPS
1440p
low186 FPS
medium185 FPS
high156 FPS
ultra124 FPS
4K
low71 FPS
medium65 FPS
high59 FPS
ultra46 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low118 FPS
medium103 FPS
high77 FPS
ultra56 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS
medium69 FPS
high51 FPS
ultra37 FPS
4K
low50 FPS
medium41 FPS
high25 FPS
ultra19 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low271 FPS
medium236 FPS
high203 FPS
ultra177 FPS
1440p
low196 FPS
medium180 FPS
high158 FPS
ultra126 FPS
4K
low101 FPS
medium82 FPS
high57 FPS
ultra43 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GTX 1650

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,390 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 132.1%. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 10 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
3,390
7,869+132%
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Turing
Process Node
10 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
96
896+833%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12.1
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
QuickSync
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
QuickSync
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 70°C.

FeatureTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
30W-60%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85
70°C-18%
Perf/Watt
113.0+8%
104.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 costs 33.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 54.7% better value. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).

FeatureTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$100-33%
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$50-33%
$75
Performance per Dollar
67.8
104.9+55%
Codename
Tiger Lake Xe
TU117
Release
August 15 2020
April 23 2019
Ranking
#508
#323