CPU
GPU
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 590
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank #150 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 590 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 590 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $100 for the GeForce GTX 590, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 102.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+102.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GTX 590
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
GeForce GTX 590
The GeForce GTX 590 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,341 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,390 and the GeForce GTX 590 reaches 3,341 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce GTX 590 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 590).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,390+1% | 3,341 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 96 | 1024 ×2+967% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 590 has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 590 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 590). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 590).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | — |
| Decoder | QuickSync | PureVideo HD (VP5) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 590's 365W — a 169.6% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 700W (GeForce GTX 590). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 90°C.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-92% | 365W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85-6% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 113.0+1128% | 9.2 |
Value Analysis
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 590 launched at $699 and now averages $100. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 33.4 (GeForce GTX 590) — the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers 103% better value. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce GTX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-86% | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-50% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.8+103% | 33.4 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GF110 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | March 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #508 | #555 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GTX 590
