CPU
GPU
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank #150 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 554% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.
| Insight | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-554%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+554%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 63.5% better value per dollar than the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.
| Insight | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+63.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce RTX 3070
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,390 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 554%. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 10 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,390 | 22,172+554% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Ampere |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 96 | 5888+6033% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 152% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-86% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 113.0+12% | 100.8 |
Value Analysis
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 costs 75% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 63.6% better value.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-80% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-75% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.8 | 110.9+64% |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GA104 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #508 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce RTX 3070
