CPU
GPU
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 460
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank 150 and the Radeon Pro 460 is on rank 176, so the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 460
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses modern memory architecture. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 460 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 460 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.
| Insight | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $150 for the Radeon Pro 460, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 194.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+194.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon Pro 460
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Radeon Pro 460
The Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,453 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,390 and the Radeon Pro 460 reaches 3,453 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Radeon Pro 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 460).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,390 | 3,453+2% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 96 | 1024+967% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the Radeon Pro 460's 35W — a 15.4% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-14% | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 113.0+14% | 98.7 |
Value Analysis
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon Pro 460 launched at $500 and now averages $150. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 23.0 (Radeon Pro 460) — the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers 194.8% better value. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-80% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-67% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.8+195% | 23.0 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | Baffin |
| Release | August 15 2020 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #508 | #547 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon Pro 460
