CPU
GPU
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
Tesla C2050 / C2070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank 150 and the Tesla C2050 / C2070 is on rank 327, so the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050 / C2070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.
| Insight | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (248mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $50 for the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, it costs 40% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 68.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+68.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Tesla C2050 / C2070
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Tesla C2050 / C2070
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,390 and the Tesla C2050 / C2070 reaches 3,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 uses Fermi, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,390 | 3,428+1% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Fermi |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 96 | 448+367% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 has 6 GB. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 11_0 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1+10% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the Tesla C2050 / C2070's 238W — a 155.2% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 248mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-87% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 248mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 113.0+685% | 14.4 |
Value Analysis
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499 and now averages $30. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 114.3 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 68.6% better value. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-96% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $30-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.8 | 114.3+69% |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GF100 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #508 | #569 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Tesla C2050 / C2070
