CPU
GPU
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank #150 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 269.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.
| Insight | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-269.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+269.8%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $209 for the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB, it costs 76% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 13% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+13%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,390 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 269.8%. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 10 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,390 | 12,535+270% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Ampere |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 96 | 2560+2567% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 125% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 66°C.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-77% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 66°C-22% |
| Perf/Watt | 113.0+17% | 96.4 |
Value Analysis
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 costs 76.1% less ($159 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers 13% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-60% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-76% | $209 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.8+13% | 60.0 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GA106 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #508 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
