CPU
GPU
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
Quadro P600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank #150 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses modern memory architecture. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P600.
| Insight | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $60 for the Quadro P600, it costs 17% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 22.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+22.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro P600
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Quadro P600
The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.
Graphics Performance
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,390 and the Quadro P600 reaches 3,318 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Quadro P600 uses Pascal, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 384 (Quadro P600).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,390+2% | 3,318 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Pascal |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 96 | 384+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 12_1 (Quadro P600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the Quadro P600's 40W — a 28.6% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 350W (Quadro P600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-25% | 40W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 145mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 113.0+36% | 83.0 |
Value Analysis
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro P600 launched at $0 and now averages $60. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 costs 16.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 55.3 (Quadro P600) — the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers 22.6% better value. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-17% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.8+23% | 55.3 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GP107 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #508 | #558 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro P600
