
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank #150 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 560X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 560X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $50 for the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 23.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+23.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon RX 560X
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

Radeon RX 560X
The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,390 and the Radeon RX 560X reaches 3,340 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Radeon RX 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,390+1% | 3,340 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 96 | 1024+967% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560X has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 560X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the Radeon RX 560X's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 400W (Radeon RX 560X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 113.0+154% | 44.5 |
Value Analysis
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon RX 560X launched at $129 and now averages $40. The Radeon RX 560X costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) vs 83.5 (Radeon RX 560X) — the Radeon RX 560X offers 23.2% better value. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-22% | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $40-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.8 | 83.5+23% |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | Polaris 21 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #508 | #556 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















