
Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Xeon 6780E

Xeon Platinum 8368

Xeon 6780E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8368
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6780E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($429) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($8,513) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sierra Forest (2024) / Intel 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2006%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($429) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($8,513) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8368 and Xeon 6780E

Xeon Platinum 8368
The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.

Xeon 6780E
The Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 144 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 108 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 86,734 points. Launch price was $11,350.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8368 packs 38 cores / 76 threads, while the Xeon 6780E offers 144 cores / 144 threads — the Xeon 6780E has 106 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon 6780E — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon 6780E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8368 scores 92,054 against the Xeon 6780E's 86,734 — a 6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368. L3 cache: 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368 vs 108 MB (total) on the Xeon 6780E.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 38 / 76 | 144 / 144+279% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+13% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+9% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 57 MB (total) | 108 MB (total)+89% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4 MB (per module)+300% |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 3 nm-70% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| PassMark | 92,054+6% | 86,734 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 20,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,961 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6780E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6780E — the Xeon 6780E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8368 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs 88 (Xeon 6780E) — the Xeon 6780E offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+50% | 4 TB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 88+38% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6780E). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server, Xeon 6780E targets Cloud Native Compute. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon 6780E rivals EPYC 9754.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | Server | Cloud Native Compute |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8368 launched at $7214 MSRP, while the Xeon 6780E debuted at $11350. At current prices ($429 vs $8513), the Xeon Platinum 8368 is $8084 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8368 delivers 214.6 pts/$ vs 10.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6780E — making the Xeon Platinum 8368 the 181.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7214-36% | $11350 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $429-95% | $8513 |
| Performance per Dollar | 214.6+2004% | 10.2 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















