
Xeon Platinum 8380

Xeon w7-3465X
Xeon Platinum 8380 vs Xeon w7-3465X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Platinum 8380 vs Xeon w7-3465X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Platinum 8380 vs Xeon w7-3465X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Platinum 8380
2021Why buy it
- ✅+144.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Costs $879 less on MSRP ($2,010 MSRP vs $2,889 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $2,889 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 270W instead of 300W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3465X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 75 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3465X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w7-3465X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (75 MB vs 60 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (16,351 vs 40,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.7 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($2,889 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Platinum 8380 better than Xeon w7-3465X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Platinum 8380 vs Xeon w7-3465X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Platinum 8380
The Xeon Platinum 8380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 40 cores and 80 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,318 points. Launch price was $5,846.

Xeon w7-3465X
The Xeon w7-3465X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 62,663 points. Launch price was $2,889.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8380 packs 40 cores / 80 threads, while the Xeon w7-3465X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8380 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8380 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3465X — a 34.1% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3465X (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8380 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon w7-3465X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8380 scores 62,318 against the Xeon w7-3465X's 62,663 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon w7-3465X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,300 vs 1,959, a 40.4% lead for the Xeon w7-3465X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 40,000 vs 16,351 (83.9% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8380). L3 cache: 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8380 vs 75 MB on the Xeon w7-3465X.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8380 | Xeon w7-3465X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 40 / 80+43% | 28 / 56 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+41% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 60 MB (total) | 75 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 62,318 | 62,663 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,300 | 1,959+51% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 40,000+145% | 16,351 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8380 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3465X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8380 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3465X — the Xeon w7-3465X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8380 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8380) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3465X) — the Xeon w7-3465X offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8380) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3465X).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8380 | Xeon w7-3465X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+50% | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 112+75% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w7-3465X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8380) vs true (Xeon w7-3465X). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8380 targets Datacenter. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8380 rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon w7-3465X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8380 | Xeon w7-3465X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Datacenter | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8380 was priced at $2010, while the Xeon w7-3465X came in at $2889. On launch pricing ($2010 vs $2889), Xeon Platinum 8380 was $879 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8380 delivers 31.0 pts/$ vs 21.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3465X — making the Xeon Platinum 8380 the 35.4% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8380 | Xeon w7-3465X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2010-30% | $2889 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.0+43% | 21.7 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















