Arc A310 vs Radeon RX 6300

CPU

GPU

Arc A310

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Radeon RX 6300

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Arc A310 vs Radeon RX 6300 Performance Spectrum

Arc A310

4 GB 75

5,438

+2.2%

5,319

0.0%

Radeon R7 260

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A310 vs Radeon RX 6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A310 vs Radeon RX 6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A310

2022

Why buy it

✅0.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Radeon RX 6300 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌
66.7% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 54.4 vs 88.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 63% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 54.4 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (5,438 vs 5,319), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Arc A310 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support and 12 vs 6 ray-tracing units. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 6300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $60 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 63% (88.7 vs 54.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Arc A310 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc A310 vs Radeon RX 6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A310

The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A310 scores 5,438 and the Radeon RX 6300 reaches 5,319 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (Arc A310) vs 12 (Radeon RX 6300) with 96 Tensor cores.

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon RX 6300
G3D Mark Score	5,438+2%	5,319
Architecture	Generation 12.7	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	768	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.072 TFLOPS	3.686 TFLOPS+20%
Boost Clock	2000 MHz	2400 MHz+20%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	1.1 MB+340%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	6	12+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Arc A310 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon RX 6300
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 124 GB/s (Arc A310) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300) — a 93.8% advantage for the Arc A310. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A310 and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon RX 6300
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	124 GB/s+94%	64 GB/s
Bus Width	64-bit+100%	32-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A310) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon RX 6300
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12_2
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A310) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 3.0.

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon RX 6300
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 3.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 3.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 169mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon RX 6300
TDP	75W	35W-53%
Recommended PSU	300W	300W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	169mm	160mm
Height	69mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	72.5	152.0+110%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A310 came in at $100, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6300 was 40% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 54.4 (Arc A310) vs 88.7 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 63.1% better value.

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon RX 6300
MSRP	$100	$60-40%
Performance per Dollar	54.4	88.7+63%
Codename	DG2-128	Navi 24
Release	October 12 2022	January 4 2022
Ranking	#422	#379

Search Arc A310 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 6300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.