Arc A770M vs Arc A580

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A770M

#22

Radeon RX 7700

MSRP: $449|Avg: $399

133%

#25

Radeon RX 7600M XT

MSRP: $329|Avg: $300

120%

#28

Radeon RX 6650M XT

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

115%

#30

Radeon 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

110%

#31

Radeon RX 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

109%

#35

Arc A770M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#39

Radeon RX 7700S

MSRP: $449|Avg: $350

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A580

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

108%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

103%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

102%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

102%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

102%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

101%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

100%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

100%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

99%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

98%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

97%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

97%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

95%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

95%

#15

Radeon RX 6500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $150

95%

#16

GeForce RTX 3070

MSRP: $499|Avg: $200

94%

#17

Radeon RX 6700

MSRP: $379|Avg: $300

94%

#18

Radeon RX 6600 XT

MSRP: $379|Avg: $170

92%

#19

Radeon RX590 GME

MSRP: $173|Avg: $115

92%

#20

Radeon RX 6650 XT

MSRP: $399|Avg: $230

91%

#21

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti

MSRP: $379|Avg: $379

90%

#22

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

MSRP: $169|Avg: $179

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc A580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A770M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Arc A770M	Arc A580
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity	🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm)	🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (16 GB)	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	Standard Size (271mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A580 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A770M Benchmark Check

Arc A580 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770M and Arc A580

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

Arc A580

The Arc A580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 10 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,060 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the Arc A580 reaches 12,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Arc A580 uses Generation 12.7, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 3,072 (Arc A580). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Arc A580). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770M) vs 24 (Arc A580) with 512 Tensor cores vs 384.

Feature	Arc A770M	Arc A580
G3D Mark Score	11,853	12,060+2%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Generation 12.7
Process Node	6 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	4096+33%	3072
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.79 TFLOPS+37%	12.29 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+3%	2000 MHz
ROPs	128+33%	96
TMUs	256+33%	192
L2 Cache	16 MB+100%	8 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	32+33%	24
Tensor Cores	512+33%	384

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770M	Arc A580
Upscaling Tech	XeSS	XeSS
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A580 has 8 GB. The Arc A770M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 8 MB (Arc A580) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770M	Arc A580
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s	512 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+100%	8 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770M	Arc A580
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A580). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A580).

Feature	Arc A770M	Arc A580
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	Xe Media Engine
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	Xe Media Engine
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the Arc A580's 175W — a 37.3% difference. The Arc A770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 600W (Arc A580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 271mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70.

Feature	Arc A770M	Arc A580
TDP	120W-31%	175W
Recommended PSU	500W-17%	600W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	0mm	271mm
Height	0mm	132mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	70-13%
Perf/Watt	98.8+43%	68.9