Arc Graphics 130V
GeForce GTX 1650
Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc Graphics 130V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe² (2024) on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,510 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌101.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+74.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 251.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Arc Graphics 130V is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc Graphics 130V scores 4,510 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 74.5%. The Arc Graphics 130V is built on Xe² while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 3 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1850 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,510 | 7,869+74% |
| Architecture | Xe² | Turing |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 7 | 896+12700% |
| Boost Clock | 1850 MHz+11% | 1665 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc Graphics 130V leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 130V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 130V and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130V) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130V draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 300.7+187% | 104.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc Graphics 130V came in at $300, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 50.3% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 252% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 130V (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $149-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0 | 52.8+252% |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | TU117 |
| Release | September 24 2024 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #463 | #323 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 130V and GeForce GTX 1650
