Arc Graphics 130V
GeForce RTX 4070
Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc Graphics 130V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe² (2024) on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,510 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+496.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 198.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc Graphics 130V scores 4,510 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 496.9%. The Arc Graphics 130V is built on Xe² while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 3 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1850 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,510 | 26,919+497% |
| Architecture | Xe² | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7 | 5888+84014% |
| Boost Clock | 1850 MHz | 2475 MHz+34% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Arc Graphics 130V does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc Graphics 130V leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 130V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 130V and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130V draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 172.1% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 304mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 304mm |
| Height | 0mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 300.7+123% | 134.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc Graphics 130V came in at $300, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 130V was 49.9% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 199.3% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 130V (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-50% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0 | 44.9+199% |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | AD104 |
| Release | September 24 2024 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #463 | #32 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 130V and GeForce RTX 4070
