PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom N475 vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom N475 vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom N475

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (405 vs 25,029).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA559, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +1965.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 2264.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 5.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA559 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
161.3% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$75 MSRP
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N475 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Atom N475?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1965.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6080% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1965.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 6080% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in 161.3% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1965.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2264.8% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 5.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2010), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA559, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 1/2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom N475 vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom N475

The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom N475 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 9 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 86.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 1.83 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Atom N475 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N475 scores 405 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 193.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom N475 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Atom N475	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	10 / 16+900%
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz	4.6 GHz+151%
Base Clock	1.83 GHz	2.5 GHz+37%
L3 Cache	0 kB	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+40860%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	45 nm	Intel 7 nm-84%
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	405	25,029+6080%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,408

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N475 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-667 on the Atom N475 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 619.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 9500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom N475) vs 2 (Core i5-13400F). PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom N475) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N475) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Atom N475	Core i5-13400F
Socket	FCBGA559	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-667	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+620%
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	192 GB+9500%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom N475) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Atom N475 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Atom N475	Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel GMA 3150	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Atom N475 was priced at $75, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($75 vs $196), Atom N475 was $121 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom N475 delivers 5.4 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 183.8% better value option.

Feature	Atom N475	Core i5-13400F
MSRP	$75-62%	$196
Performance per Dollar	5.4	127.7+2265%
Release Date	2010	2023

Search Atom N475 on Amazon

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.