
Celeron 1047UE

Ryzen 5 3600
Celeron 1047UE vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 1047UE vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Cyberpunk 2077

Deadlock
Celeron 1047UE vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 1047UE
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (293 vs 1,898).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +1099.3% higher average FPS across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Delivers 1216.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌99% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1047UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Celeron 1047UE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 1047UE vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1047UE
The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Celeron 1047UE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 100% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600. The Celeron 1047UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 185.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 159 vs 1,295, a 156.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 293 vs 1,898 (146.5% advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Celeron 1047UE | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 1.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz+200% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 675 | 17,685+2520% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 159 | 1,295+714% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 293 | 1,898+548% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1047UE versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1047UE) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | Celeron 1047UE | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR4-3200+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 1047UE) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Celeron 1047UE | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 1047UE was priced at $100, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($100 vs $199), Celeron 1047UE was $99 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1047UE delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 171.8% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 1047UE | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-50% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 88.9+1207% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














