Celeron 1047UE vs Ryzen 7 3700X

CPU

GPU

Celeron 1047UE

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2013

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron 1047UE vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

Celeron 1047UE

2 / 2

675

0.0%

22,430

+3223.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1047UE vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1047UE vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1047UE

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (675 vs 22,430).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +1394.1% higher average FPS across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Delivers 910.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
229% HIGHER MSRP
$329 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1047UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Celeron 1047UE?

Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1394.1% average FPS lead across 34 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3223% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1394.1% more average FPS across 34 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 3223% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in 229.0% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1394.1% average FPS lead across 34 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 910.0% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 6.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013), 1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1047UE vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1047UE

The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 1047UE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 103.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X. The Celeron 1047UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 188.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	8 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	4.4 GHz+214%
Base Clock	—	3.6 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	32 MB+1500%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-68%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	675	22,430+3223%
Geekbench 6 Single	159	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	293	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1047UE versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1047UE) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	BGA1023	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR4-3200+100%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	128 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 1047UE) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 1047UE was priced at $100, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($100 vs $329), Celeron 1047UE was $229 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1047UE delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 164% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP	$100-70%	$329
Performance per Dollar	6.8	68.2+903%
Release Date	2013	2019

Search Celeron 1047UE on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.