Celeron 570 vs Core i7-9700K

CPU

GPU

Celeron 570

31 WW2008

Buy on Amazon

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Buy on Amazon

Celeron 570 vs Core i7-9700K Performance Spectrum

Celeron 570

505

0.0%

14,397

+2750.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 570 vs Core i7-9700K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 570 vs Core i7-9700K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 570

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Draws 31W instead of 95W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (505 vs 14,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +1637.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+1100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 1 MB).
✅Delivers 892.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 3.8 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Celeron 570 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
187.3% HIGHER MSRP
$385 MSRPvs$134 MSRP
❌206.5% higher power demand at 95W vs 31W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Celeron 570?

Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1637.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2750.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1637.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 2750.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 1 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-9700K is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700K comes in 187.3% more expensive on MSRP at $385 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1637.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 892.3% better value on MSRP (37.4 vs 3.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-9700K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2008) and 1100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 1 MB). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 570 vs Core i7-9700K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 570

The Celeron 570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K is built on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 570 scores 505 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 186.4% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 570 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K.

Feature	Celeron 570	Core i7-9700K
Cores / Threads	—	8 / 8
Boost Clock	—	4.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.26 GHz	3.6 GHz+59%
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	12 MB (total)+1100%
L2 Cache	—	256K (per core)
Process	65 nm	14 nm-78%
Architecture	—	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
PassMark	505	14,397+2751%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 570 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron 570 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K — the Core i7-9700K supports 299.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron 570) vs 16 (Core i7-9700K) — the Core i7-9700K offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron 570) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K).

Feature	Celeron 570	Core i7-9700K
Socket	PGA478	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	DDR4-2666+300%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	128 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 570) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Celeron 570 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 570 targets Budget, Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 570 rivals Pentium T2310.

Feature	Celeron 570	Core i7-9700K
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	No	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 570 was priced at $134, while the Core i7-9700K came in at $385. On launch pricing ($134 vs $385), Celeron 570 was $251 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 570 delivers 3.8 pts/$ vs 37.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700K — making the Core i7-9700K the 163.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 570	Core i7-9700K
MSRP	$134-65%	$385
Performance per Dollar	3.8	37.4+884%
Release Date	2008	2018

Search Celeron 570 on Amazon

Search Core i7-9700K on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.