Celeron 570 vs Turion 64 MT-30

CPU

GPU

Celeron 570

31 WW2008

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Turion 64 MT-30

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron 570 vs Turion 64 MT-30 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 570

505

+6.3%

475

0.0%

Athlon XP 2100+

Athlon XP 2400+

Athlon XP 2700+

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

Ryzen 5 8640HS

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 570 vs Turion 64 MT-30 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 570 vs Turion 64 MT-30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 570

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Turion 64 MT-30 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3000% higher power demand at 31W vs 1W.

Turion 64 MT-30

2005

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 31W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 570 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (475 vs 505).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 570 better than Turion 64 MT-30?

Yes. Celeron 570 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 570 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 570 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.3% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 570 is the better buy right now. Celeron 570 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $134 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (3.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 570 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2005). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 570 vs Turion 64 MT-30 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 570

The Celeron 570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion 64 MT-30

The Turion 64 MT-30 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion 64 MT-30 is built on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 570 scores 505 against the Turion 64 MT-30's 475 — a 6.1% lead for the Celeron 570. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 570 vs 0 kB on the Turion 64 MT-30.

Feature	Celeron 570	Turion 64 MT-30
Cores / Threads	—	1 / 1
Boost Clock	—	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.26 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	1 MB
Process	65 nm-28%	90 nm
Architecture	—	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	505+6%	475

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 570 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 MT-30 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 570	Turion 64 MT-30
Socket	PGA478	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 570) / not specified (Turion 64 MT-30). Primary use case: Celeron 570 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 570 rivals Pentium T2310.