Celeron G3930TE vs Celeron N6211

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930TE vs Celeron N6211 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930TE vs Celeron N6211: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930TE

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Celeron N6211 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N6211 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,218 vs 2,245).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Celeron N6211 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2233.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 1.5W.

Celeron N6211

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N6211 better than Celeron G3930TE?

Yes. Celeron N6211 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N6211 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N6211 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N6211 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N6211 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G3930TE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (52.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N6211 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3930TE vs Celeron N6211 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930TE

The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.

Celeron N6211

The Celeron N6211 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 July 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Elkhart Lake (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1493. Thermal design power (TDP): 1.5 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $54.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3930TE and Celeron N6211 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE versus 3 GHz on the Celeron N6211 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Celeron N6211 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron G3930TE uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron N6211 uses Elkhart Lake (2022) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930TE scores 2,218 against the Celeron N6211's 2,245 — a 1.2% lead for the Celeron N6211.

Feature	Celeron G3930TE	Celeron N6211
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+125%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1.5 MB+200%
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Elkhart Lake (2022)
PassMark	2,218	2,245+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	548	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	948	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N6211 uses BGA1493 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G3930TE	Celeron N6211
Socket	LGA1151	BGA1493
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3930TE) / not specified (Celeron N6211). The Celeron G3930TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Celeron N6211 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T.