Celeron SU2300 vs Celeron 925
Celeron SU2300
Celeron 925
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron SU2300 is positioned at rank 1223 and the Celeron 925 is on rank 1202, so the Celeron 925 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron SU2300
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 925
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron SU2300 | Celeron 925 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($134) | ✅ More affordable ($100) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron SU2300 | Celeron 925 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+29%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($134) | ✅ More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron SU2300 and Celeron 925
Celeron SU2300
The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron 925
The Celeron 925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
In PassMark, the Celeron SU2300 scores 545 against the Celeron 925's 525 — a 3.7% lead for the Celeron SU2300. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 925.
| Feature | Celeron SU2300 | Celeron 925 |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz+92% |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| PassMark | 545+4% | 525 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Celeron SU2300) / No (Celeron 925). Primary use case: Celeron 925 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 925 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Celeron SU2300 | Celeron 925 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | No |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Celeron SU2300 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Celeron 925 debuted at $100. At current prices ($134 vs $100), the Celeron 925 is $34 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron SU2300 delivers 4.1 pts/$ vs 5.3 pts/$ for the Celeron 925 — making the Celeron 925 the 25.4% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron SU2300 | Celeron 925 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $134 | $100-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $134 | $100-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.1 | 5.3+29% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron SU2300 and Celeron 925
