PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron SU2300 vs Core i7-9700K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron SU2300 vs Core i7-9700K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron SU2300

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Draws 10W instead of 95W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (545 vs 14,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +1514.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+1100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 1 MB).
✅Delivers 819.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 4.1 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Celeron SU2300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
187.3% HIGHER MSRP
$385 MSRPvs$134 MSRP
❌850% higher power demand at 95W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Celeron SU2300?

Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1514.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2541.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1514.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 2541.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 1 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-9700K is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700K comes in 187.3% more expensive on MSRP at $385 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1514.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 819.4% better value on MSRP (37.4 vs 4.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-9700K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2009) and 1100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 1 MB). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron SU2300 vs Core i7-9700K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron SU2300

The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K is built on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron SU2300 scores 545 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 185.4% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K.

Feature	Celeron SU2300	Core i7-9700K
Cores / Threads	—	8 / 8
Boost Clock	—	4.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+200%
L3 Cache	1 MB	12 MB (total)+1100%
L2 Cache	—	256K (per core)
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	—	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
PassMark	545	14,397+2542%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron SU2300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron SU2300	Core i7-9700K
Socket	BGA956	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron SU2300) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Celeron SU2300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

Feature	Celeron SU2300	Core i7-9700K
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron SU2300 was priced at $134, while the Core i7-9700K came in at $385. On launch pricing ($134 vs $385), Celeron SU2300 was $251 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron SU2300 delivers 4.1 pts/$ vs 37.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700K — making the Core i7-9700K the 160.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron SU2300	Core i7-9700K
MSRP	$134-65%	$385
Performance per Dollar	4.1	37.4+812%
Release Date	2009	2018

Search Celeron SU2300 on Amazon

Search Core i7-9700K on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.