EPYC 7662 vs EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7662
EPYC 7H12
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7662
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7H12
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7662 | EPYC 7H12 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,266) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,340) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7662 | EPYC 7H12 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+10%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,266) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,340) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7662
The EPYC 7662 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 32 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 72,298 points. Launch price was $6,700.
EPYC 7H12
The EPYC 7H12 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2019-09-18. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 69,633 points. Launch price was $6,950.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7H12 share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7662 versus 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7H12 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture using a 7 nm, 14 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 7662 scores 72,298 against the EPYC 7H12's 69,633 — a 3.8% lead for the EPYC 7662. L3 cache: 256 MB on the EPYC 7662 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7H12.
| Feature | EPYC 7662 | EPYC 7H12 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.6 GHz+30% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 72,298+4% | 69,633 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7662 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7H12 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7662) and SP3 (EPYC 7H12).
| Feature | EPYC 7662 | EPYC 7H12 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7662 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; EPYC 7H12 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.
| Feature | EPYC 7662 | EPYC 7H12 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7662 launched at $6150 MSRP, while the EPYC 7H12 debuted at $6950. At current prices ($1266 vs $1340), the EPYC 7662 is $74 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7662 delivers 57.1 pts/$ vs 52.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 7H12 — making the EPYC 7662 the 9.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7662 | EPYC 7H12 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6150-12% | $6950 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1266-6% | $1340 |
| Performance per Dollar | 57.1+10% | 52.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7H12
