EPYC 9254 vs Xeon Gold 6438Y+

AMD

EPYC 9254

24 Cores48 Thrd200 WWMax: 4.15 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6438Y+

32 Cores64 Thrd205 WWMax: 4 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 9254 vs Xeon Gold 6438Y+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9254 vs Xeon Gold 6438Y+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9254 vs Xeon Gold 6438Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9254

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 200W instead of 205W, a 5W reduction.
  • 60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.1 vs 24.0 PassMark/$ ($3,761 MSRP vs $2,607 MSRP).

Xeon Gold 6438Y+

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,154 less on MSRP ($2,607 MSRP vs $3,761 MSRP).
  • Delivers 40.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.0 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($2,607 MSRP vs $3,761 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9254 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (62,660 vs 64,344).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9254 better than Xeon Gold 6438Y+?
Yes. EPYC 9254 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9254 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 128 MB versus 60 MB.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9254 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.7% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 60 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9254 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6438Y+ is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9254 comes in 44.3% more expensive on MSRP at $3,761 MSRP versus $2,607 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 6438Y+ is also 40.5% better value on MSRP (24.0 vs 17.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6438Y+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 9254 vs Xeon Gold 6438Y+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9254

The EPYC 9254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 64,344 points. Launch price was $2,299.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6438Y+

The Xeon Gold 6438Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 62,660 points. Launch price was $3,141.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9254 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.15 GHz on the EPYC 9254 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ — a 3.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9254 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9254 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9254 scores 64,344 against the Xeon Gold 6438Y+'s 62,660 — a 2.7% lead for the EPYC 9254. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9254 vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6438Y+.

FeatureEPYC 9254Xeon Gold 6438Y+
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock
4.15 GHz+4%
4 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+45%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+113%
60 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
5 nm, 6 nm-50%
10 nm
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
64,344+3%
62,660
Geekbench 6 Single
2,233
Geekbench 6 Multi
18,023
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9254 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9254 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9254) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6438Y+). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9254) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6438Y+) — the EPYC 9254 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9254) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6438Y+).

FeatureEPYC 9254Xeon Gold 6438Y+
Socket
SP5
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
4800
Max RAM Capacity
6144 GB+50%
4096 GB
RAM Channels
12+50%
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+60%
80
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9254) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6438Y+). Primary use case: EPYC 9254 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9254 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon Gold 6438Y+ rivals EPYC 9354.

FeatureEPYC 9254Xeon Gold 6438Y+
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Enterprise Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9254 was priced at $3761, while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ came in at $2607. On launch pricing ($3761 vs $2607), Xeon Gold 6438Y+ was $1154 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9254 delivers 17.1 pts/$ vs 24.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ — making the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ the 33.7% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9254Xeon Gold 6438Y+
MSRP
$3761
$2607-31%
Performance per Dollar
17.1
24.0+40%
Release Date
2022
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.