
EPYC 9254

Xeon Gold 6438Y+
EPYC 9254 vs Xeon Gold 6438Y+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9254 vs Xeon Gold 6438Y+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9254 vs Xeon Gold 6438Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9254
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 205W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.1 vs 24.0 PassMark/$ ($3,761 MSRP vs $2,607 MSRP).
Xeon Gold 6438Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,154 less on MSRP ($2,607 MSRP vs $3,761 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.0 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($2,607 MSRP vs $3,761 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9254 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,660 vs 64,344).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9254 better than Xeon Gold 6438Y+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9254 vs Xeon Gold 6438Y+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9254
The EPYC 9254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 64,344 points. Launch price was $2,299.

Xeon Gold 6438Y+
The Xeon Gold 6438Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 62,660 points. Launch price was $3,141.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9254 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.15 GHz on the EPYC 9254 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ — a 3.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9254 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9254 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9254 scores 64,344 against the Xeon Gold 6438Y+'s 62,660 — a 2.7% lead for the EPYC 9254. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9254 vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6438Y+.
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.15 GHz+4% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+45% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+113% | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 64,344+3% | 62,660 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,233 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,023 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9254 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9254 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9254) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6438Y+). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9254) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6438Y+) — the EPYC 9254 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9254) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6438Y+).
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+50% | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9254) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6438Y+). Primary use case: EPYC 9254 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9254 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon Gold 6438Y+ rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Enterprise Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9254 was priced at $3761, while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ came in at $2607. On launch pricing ($3761 vs $2607), Xeon Gold 6438Y+ was $1154 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9254 delivers 17.1 pts/$ vs 24.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ — making the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ the 33.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3761 | $2607-31% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.1 | 24.0+40% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















