EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Core Ultra 7 265F
EPYC Embedded 8224P
Core Ultra 7 265F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC Embedded 8224P
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,048) | ✅ More affordable ($276) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+282%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,048) | ✅ More affordable ($276) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC Embedded 8224P and Core Ultra 7 265F
EPYC Embedded 8224P
The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.
Core Ultra 7 265F
The Core Ultra 7 265F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,161 points. Launch price was $379.
Processing Power
The EPYC Embedded 8224P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265F offers 20 cores / 20 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265F — a 55.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265F (base: 2.55 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265F uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 48,869 against the Core Ultra 7 265F's 49,161 — a 0.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265F. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P vs 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265F.
| Feature | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+20% | 20 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 5.3 GHz+77% |
| Base Clock | 2.55 GHz+6% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+113% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+200% |
| Process | 5 nm | 3 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 48,869 | 49,161 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 25,459 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 20,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC Embedded 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265F uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC Embedded 8224P versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265F — the EPYC Embedded 8224P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC Embedded 8224P supports up to 1152 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 127.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 2 (Core Ultra 7 265F). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs 24 (Core Ultra 7 265F) — the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) and Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 7 265F).
| Feature | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 | 256 GB+23301589% |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 96+300% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 7 265F has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC Embedded 8224P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265F). Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 265F targets High Performance Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
| Feature | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Performance Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC Embedded 8224P launched at $855 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 265F debuted at $369. At current prices ($1048 vs $276), the Core Ultra 7 265F is $772 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC Embedded 8224P delivers 46.6 pts/$ vs 178.1 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 265F — making the Core Ultra 7 265F the 117% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC Embedded 8224P | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $855 | $369-57% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1048 | $276-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.6 | 178.1+282% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC Embedded 8224P and Core Ultra 7 265F
