FirePro 2450 vs GeForce GTX 1060
FirePro 2450
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 19633.3% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 2450.
| Insight | FirePro 2450 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-19633.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+19633.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+1100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $60), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 3188.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 2450 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3188.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 2450 and GeForce GTX 1060
FirePro 2450
The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro 2450 scores 51 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 19633.3%. The FirePro 2450 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro 2450) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51 | 10,064+19633% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5491 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+1516% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 160+567% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 960 KB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 2450 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 2450) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 6 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2450) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12+19% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5+36% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (FirePro 2450) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: UVD vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2450) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | UVD | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2450 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 18.2% difference. The FirePro 2450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2450) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 170mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-17% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 170mm | 173mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 55.9+18533% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 2450 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The FirePro 2450 costs 83.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.1 (FirePro 2450) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 3188.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro 2450 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-83% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | 167.7+3188% |
| Codename | Opal | GP104 |
| Release | October 16 2013 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #879 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 2450 and GeForce GTX 1060
