FirePro M6000
VS
GeForce GTX 1060

FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 1060

FirePro M6000

2012Core: 800 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro M6000 is positioned at rank #193 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro M6000

#84
Radeon PRO V710
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
99%
#85
RTX A5500
MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200
97%
#86
Radeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550
92%
#87
A10G
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000
90%
#88
Tesla T4
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000
89%
#89
Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120
88%
#178
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2434%
#193
FirePro M6000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
100%
#196
FirePro M4170
MSRP: $200|Avg: $80
96%
#197
GRID K140Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $500
96%
#200
Radeon Pro Duo
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $799
91%
#201
P102-100
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
91%
#203
Quadro FX 2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
89%
#206
FirePro V3900
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
87%
#207
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
MSRP: $119|Avg: $89
87%
#208
Tesla K8
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 453% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M6000.

InsightFirePro M6000GeForce GTX 1060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-453%)
Leading raw performance (+453%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+200%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $60), it costs 17% less, resulting in a 360.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro M6000GeForce GTX 1060
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+360.8%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M6000 and GeForce GTX 1060

AMD

FirePro M6000

The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro M6000 scores 1,820 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 453%. The FirePro M6000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M6000) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M6000) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
1,820
10,064+453%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
640
2560+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+767%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
40
160+300%
L1 Cache
160 KB
960 KB+500%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M6000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M6000) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
6 GB+200%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce GTX 1060
DirectX
11.1
12+8%
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M6000) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (FirePro M6000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce GTX 1060
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
UVD 4.0
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M6000 draws 43W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 122.9% difference. The FirePro M6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6000) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 173mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce GTX 1060
TDP
43W-76%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin
Length
0mm
173mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
42.3
55.9+32%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro M6000 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The FirePro M6000 costs 16.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.4 (FirePro M6000) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 360.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro M6000GeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$300
$249-17%
Avg Price (30d)
$50-17%
$60
Performance per Dollar
36.4
167.7+361%
Codename
Heathrow
GP104
Release
July 1 2012
May 27 2016
Ranking
#710
#137