Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro M6000 vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro M6000

2012Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1251 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro M6000 vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor Performance Spectrum

FirePro M6000
2 GB 43
1,820
+2.9%
brand logoRadeon HD 6700M
brand logoRadeon R9 M270X
brand logoRadeon R7 M370
brand logoRadeon Vega 9
brand logoRadeon RX 6300M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
Shared System RAM 35
1,769
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 8690M
brand logoRadeon HD 5750
brand logoRadeon HD 7850M
brand logoRadeon R9 M370X
brand logoRadeon RX 6300M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M6000 vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M6000

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro M6000 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌22.9% higher power demand at 43W vs 35W.

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

2018

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 35W instead of 43W, a 8W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro M6000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (1,820 vs 1,769), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M6000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro M6000 vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M6000

The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,769 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M6000 scores 1,820 and the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor reaches 1,769 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M6000) vs 704 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M6000) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor).

FeatureFirePro M6000Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
G3D Mark Score
1,820+3%
1,769
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640
704+10%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS
1.761 TFLOPS+72%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
40
44+10%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M6000Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M6000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor carries 0 MB. FirePro M6000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M6000 and System on the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor.

FeatureFirePro M6000Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M6000) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro M6000Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
DirectX
11.1
12 (12_1)+8%
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M6000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (FirePro M6000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor).

FeatureFirePro M6000Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 3.4
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M6000 draws 43W versus the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor's 35W — a 20.5% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6000) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75.

FeatureFirePro M6000Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
TDP
43W
35W-19%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
75-12%
Perf/Watt
42.3
50.5+19%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M6000 came in at $300, while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (FirePro M6000) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) — the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor (2018 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro M6000Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
MSRP
$300
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
6.1
Infinity
Codename
Heathrow
Raven
Release
July 1 2012
May 10 2018
Ranking
#710
#673
Search FirePro M6000 on AmazonSearch Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.