
FirePro V5800 vs FirePro M4170

FirePro V5800
Popular choices:

FirePro M4170
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro V5800 is positioned at rank 269 and the FirePro M4170 is on rank 196, so the FirePro M4170 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5800
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M4170
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V5800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M4170.
| Insight | FirePro V5800 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro V5800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V5800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $80), it costs 81% less, resulting in a 440.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro V5800 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+440.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V5800 and FirePro M4170

FirePro V5800
The FirePro V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $479.

FirePro M4170
The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V5800 scores 1,184 and the FirePro M4170 reaches 1,168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro M4170 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V5800) vs 384 (FirePro M4170). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V5800) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170).
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,184+1% | 1,168 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS+60% | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 96 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V5800) vs 12 (FirePro M4170). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (FirePro V5800) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4170). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V5800) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4170).
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V5800 draws 74W versus the FirePro M4170's 150W — a 67.9% difference. The FirePro V5800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5800) vs 350W (FirePro M4170). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 59°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W-51% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 59°C-16% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 16.0+105% | 7.8 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V5800 launched at $479 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the FirePro M4170 launched at $200 and now averages $80. The FirePro V5800 costs 81.3% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 78.9 (FirePro V5800) vs 14.6 (FirePro M4170) — the FirePro V5800 offers 440.4% better value. The FirePro M4170 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | FirePro M4170 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $479 | $200-58% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-81% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 78.9+440% | 14.6 |
| Codename | Juniper | Opal |
| Release | April 26 2010 | April 23 2015 |
| Ranking | #780 | #838 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












