FirePro V5800
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 1650

FirePro V5800

2010Core: 690 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro V5800 is positioned at rank #269 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5800

#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
95%
#109
Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600
94%
#254
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5981%
#269
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
100%
#270
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
100%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
99%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
98%
#274
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
96%
#276
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
95%
#278
Tesla M60
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250
94%
#279
FirePro V7900
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
91%
#280
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
89%
#281
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
89%
#283
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V5800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 564.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro V5800.

InsightFirePro V5800GeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-564.6%)
Leading raw performance (+564.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 32.9% better value per dollar than the FirePro V5800.

InsightFirePro V5800GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+32.9%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

FirePro V5800

The FirePro V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $479.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro V5800 scores 1,184 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 564.6%. The FirePro V5800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V5800) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V5800) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureFirePro V5800GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
1,184
7,869+565%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Turing
Process Node
40 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
800
896+12%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.104 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+170%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
56+40%
L1 Cache
80 KB
896 KB+1020%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V5800GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro V5800) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro V5800GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V5800) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: None vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro V5800GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
11.2
12+7%
Vulkan
None
1.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6+5%
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (FirePro V5800) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V5800) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureFirePro V5800GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
No
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
UVD 2.3
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V5800 draws 74W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 1.3% difference. The FirePro V5800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5800) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 59°C vs 70°C.

FeatureFirePro V5800GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
74W-1%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
229mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
59°C-16%
70°C
Perf/Watt
16.0
104.9+556%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro V5800 launched at $479 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The FirePro V5800 costs 80% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 78.9 (FirePro V5800) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 33% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro V5800GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$479
$149-69%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-80%
$75
Performance per Dollar
78.9
104.9+33%
Codename
Juniper
TU117
Release
April 26 2010
April 23 2019
Ranking
#780
#323