CPU
GPU
GeForce 510
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 510 is positioned at rank #592 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 510
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4766.9% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 510.
| Insight | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4766.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4766.9%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $120 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 508.4% better value per dollar than the GeForce 510.
| Insight | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+508.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 510 and GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce 510
The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 510 scores 290 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 4766.9%. The GeForce 510 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 510) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce 510) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060) with 64 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 290 | 14,114+4767% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+7% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+36% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1680 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 40 | 48+20% |
| TMUs | 64 | 120+88% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+5% | 1.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 30+88% |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 240+275% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 510 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 510) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 510) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 510) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 510) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 145.9% difference. The GeForce 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-84% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 229mm |
| Height | 64mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-3% | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 11.6 | 88.2+660% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 510 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce 510 costs 87.5% less ($105 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.3 (GeForce 510) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 509.3% better value. The GeForce 510 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-72% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-88% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.3 | 117.6+509% |
| Codename | GA107 | TU106 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #407 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 510 and GeForce RTX 2060
