CPU
GPU
GeForce 510
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 510 is positioned at rank #592 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 510
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4000.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 510.
| Insight | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4000.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4000.7%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 310.1% better value per dollar than the GeForce 510.
| Insight | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+310.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 510 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce 510
The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 510 scores 290 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 4000.7%. The GeForce 510 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 510) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce 510) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 64 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 290 | 11,892+4001% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+90% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1755 MHz+52% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 2.5 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 20+25% |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 80+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 510 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 510) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12.2+11% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 510) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 510) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 135.5% difference. The GeForce 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 235mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-81% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 235mm |
| Height | 64mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 11.6 | 91.5+689% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 510 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The GeForce 510 costs 90% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.3 (GeForce 510) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 310.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-60% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-90% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.3 | 79.3+311% |
| Codename | GA107 | GA106 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #407 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 510 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
