G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 510 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 510 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 510

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 160W, a 135W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅2554.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 1838% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌540% higher power demand at 160W vs 25W.
❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2554.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 7710.7% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 290), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce 510 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 8nm, and 34 vs 16 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $300 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1838% (56.8 vs 2.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 510 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 510

The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 510 scores 290 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 7710.7%. The GeForce 510 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 510) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce 510) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) with 64 Tensor cores vs 136.

Feature	GeForce 510	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
G3D Mark Score	290	22,651+7711%
Architecture	Ampere	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2048	4352+113%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS	22.06 TFLOPS+366%
Boost Clock	1155 MHz	2535 MHz+119%
ROPs	40	48+20%
TMUs	64	136+113%
L1 Cache	2 MB	4.3 MB+115%
L2 Cache	2 MB	32 MB+1500%
Ray Tracing Cores	16	34+113%
Tensor Cores	64	136+113%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce 510 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce 510 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce 510	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 510 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 510 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 510) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 510	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	8 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	288 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	32 MB+1500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 510) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce 510	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
DirectX	11.0	12.2+11%
Vulkan	None	1.3
OpenGL	4.1	4.6+12%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 510) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 510) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).

Feature	GeForce 510	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Encoder	No	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 145.9% difference. The GeForce 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce 510	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
TDP	25W-84%	160W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	Legacy	8-pin
Length	168mm	240mm
Height	64mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	70°C	70°C
Perf/Watt	11.6	141.6+1121%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 510 came in at $99, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce 510 was 75.2% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce 510) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1858.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2022).

Feature	GeForce 510	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP	$99-75%	$399
Performance per Dollar	2.9	56.8+1859%
Codename	GA107	AD106
Release	Maio 2022	May 18 2023
Ranking	#407	#59

Search GeForce 510 on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.